Re: Re: arch-tag problem?

Andy Tai wrote:
>
> I am willing to offer an award.  Which will complete first, the Hurd 
> kernel (the next major version) or Arch 2.0.   Whatever finishes 
> first, its author will get US$100 from me.   Not much money, but a 
> small amount that I can give...
>

:-).   I dunno, man...  you know, arguably, there have been Hurd 
releases that are already of at least a high a quality and with at least 
as much promise as the original Linux kernel.   What do you mean by 
"finishes?"   You might already owe someone $100 ... or, equally 
plausibly, might not ever owe either party such a sum :-)

-t






> On 2/27/07, *Thomas Lord* < [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
>     Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
>     > Stop whining about the past, and finish arch 2.x.  You promised if I
>     > recall...
>     >
>     >
>
>     "Promise" is *slightly to strong a term but, yes, I haven't
>     stopped work
>     on it.
>
>     The message to which you reply was not, by any reasonable definition,
>     "whining."
>
>     -t
>
>
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Gnu-arch-users mailing list
>     [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>     http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users
>
>     GNU arch home page:
>     http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Andy Tai, [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnu-arch-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users
>
> GNU arch home page:
> http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/