Re: GPLv2 or GPLv2+
Miles Bader <[email protected]> Sat, 17 Nov 2007 11:13:23 +0900
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.version-control.arch.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
"Stephen J. Turnbull" <[email protected]> writes: > [1] Equally effective would be to divide COPYING into two parts, the > first part being labelled "The Purpose of the GNU GPL", and the second > being labelled "The GNU General Public License", and containing only > the legally enforceable terms. But this isn't going to happen either. Why not? Have you asked? -Miles -- `To alcohol! The cause of, and solution to, all of life's problems' --Homer J. Simpson