Re: revc

"Andy Tai" <[email protected]> Fri, 28 Mar 2008 06:41:51 -0700
Newsgroups gmane.comp.version-control.arch.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
--===============0399708444==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
	boundary="----=_Part_15803_14645224.1206711711366"

------=_Part_15803_14645224.1206711711366
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

I cannot say anything about revc but it seems that someone with Tom's
expertise would be needed to bring it up to maturity.  If Tom is not
interested in it we won't see it developed further.

Tla (GNU Arch 1) has architecture limitations so it won't see improvements
necessarily to be competitive with newer SCMs like git or Hg or bzr.  I
should make a new release with some minor interface improvements but there
is no major change.  So yes, GNU Arch had its glorious days but it has
passed its prime... but in the history of SCMs GNU Arch will always has its
place; git, Hg, bzr, etc. all have been influenced by GNU Arch.

Yes, bzr is now the GNU Bazaar.

On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 6:31 AM, Laurent Wandrebeck <[email protected]>
wrote:

> 2008/3/26, Andy Tai <[email protected]>:
> >
> > Thank you for locating the Arch 2.0 prototype.  It should be of
> interest,
> > historically at least.
> You're welcome.
> After a bit of reading about GNU/Arch, it seems clear that this
> wonderful piece of software is falling into oblivion :-(
> Tom is interested by something else, some devs left for bazaar, some
> went to git etc etc, and even the FSF is advocating for bazaar-ng.
> I don't think that tla 1.x is going to see a lot more dev, and revc
> hasn't (yet?) seen someone continuing the path opened by Tom.
> Is there somewhere any official position on tla's future ? Is there
> someone interested in its (revc) revival ?
> Regards,
> Laurent
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnu-arch-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users
>
> GNU arch home page:
> http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
>



-- 
Andy Tai, [email protected]

------=_Part_15803_14645224.1206711711366
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

I cannot say anything about revc but it seems that someone with Tom&#39;s expertise would be needed to bring it up to maturity.&nbsp; If Tom is not interested in it we won&#39;t see it developed further.<br><br>Tla (GNU Arch 1) has architecture limitations so it won&#39;t see improvements necessarily to be competitive with newer SCMs like git or Hg or bzr.&nbsp; I should make a new release with some minor interface improvements but there is no major change.&nbsp; So yes, GNU Arch had its glorious days but it has passed its prime... but in the history of SCMs GNU Arch will always has its place; git, Hg, bzr, etc. all have been influenced by GNU Arch.<br>
<br>Yes, bzr is now the GNU Bazaar.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 6:31 AM, Laurent Wandrebeck &lt;<a href="mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a>&gt; wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
2008/3/26, Andy Tai &lt;<a href="mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a>&gt;:<br>
<div class="Ih2E3d">&gt;<br>
&gt; Thank you for locating the Arch 2.0 prototype. &nbsp;It should be of interest,<br>
&gt; historically at least.<br>
</div>You&#39;re welcome.<br>
After a bit of reading about GNU/Arch, it seems clear that this<br>
wonderful piece of software is falling into oblivion :-(<br>
Tom is interested by something else, some devs left for bazaar, some<br>
went to git etc etc, and even the FSF is advocating for bazaar-ng.<br>
I don&#39;t think that tla 1.x is going to see a lot more dev, and revc<br>
hasn&#39;t (yet?) seen someone continuing the path opened by Tom.<br>
Is there somewhere any official position on tla&#39;s future ? Is there<br>
someone interested in its (revc) revival ?<br>
<div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c">Regards,<br>
Laurent<br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Gnu-arch-users mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users" target="_blank">http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users</a><br>
<br>
GNU arch home page:<br>
<a href="http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/" target="_blank">http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Andy Tai, <a href="mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a>

------=_Part_15803_14645224.1206711711366--



--===============0399708444==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline