Re: undoing a rename (bk mv) before 'bk commit'
Larry McVoy <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.version-control.bitkeeper.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 04:19:07PM -0700, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 04:15:11PM -0700, Larry McVoy wrote:
>
> > cd `bk root`
> > bk sfiles -pC > LIST
> > $EDITOR LIST # find the entry that matches your rm, delete everything ELSE
> > bk stripdel - < LIST
> > bk -r names
> > bk -r check -a
>
> thanks, i'll try that... it's much more complicated than I imagined
> though --- is there any value in making this a script perhaps?
> something like 'bk undomv' or similar?
bk help unrm
vi `bk bin`/bk.script
/unrm
<copy that to a script and modify it if you wish>
> > Statements that something sucks without information about what it is
> > that you think sucks (a) will not get it to not suck and (b) don't
> > endear your to friendly BitKeeper developers. Just an FYI.
>
> yeah, but you know i actually quite like BK so (b) is bogus and (a)
> will be a separate email not to distract from my original question...
Time for that annual message on who gets helped when. This isn't hard and
fast, 1/1 bugs are 1/1 bugs no matter who submits them but for something
like your problem this definitely applies:
1) People who are nice and pay us.
2) People who are not nice but pay us.
3) People who are nice and don't pay us.
4) People who are not nice and don't pay us.
You control where you are in that queue, it doesn't matter to me so long
as you understand that. It's worth thinking about that ordering, I suspect
it is true world wide (whether it is admitted or not is a different matter).
--
---
Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitkeeper.com
_______________________________________________
Bitkeeper-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://bitmover.com/mailman/listinfo/bitkeeper-users
To unsubscribe from this list, go to the above URL, follow instruction at the bottom of the web page.