Re: "bk pull" is not updating my local repository
Timur Tabi <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.version-control.bitkeeper.user |
|---|---|
| Organization | Ammasso |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Larry McVoy wrote: > Sure you can but what if you pull in updates and then you decide the updates > were garbage and you want to go backwards? You no longer can because you > stomped on your local changes. All BitKeeper is doing is telling you that > you have local work and the new work you are trying to apply modifies the > same files. If we stomped on the files or automerged them there is no way > to undo that pull. All I want is for BK to give me the latest versions of files that I haven't edited, and allow me to do a merge on the files that I have edited, without checking my files in. Checking them in requires that I specify changelog comments, and I don't want to do that until I'm done with everything. > It's extremely common amongst BK users to do "let's see if I want this stuff" > pull. > > bk pull > # look look look, nah, this is junk, I'll wait for it to stabilize > bk unpull I can't imagine ever wanting to do that, but I guess I just don't "get" bitkeeper. -- Timur Tabi Staff Software Engineer [email protected] _______________________________________________ Bitkeeper-users mailing list [email protected] http://bitmover.com/mailman/listinfo/bitkeeper-users To unsubscribe from this list, go to the above URL, follow instruction at the bottom of the web page.