Re: "bk pull" is not updating my local repository
Thomas Glanzmann <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.version-control.bitkeeper.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hello, * Timur Tabi <[email protected]> [040823 23:40]: > All I want is for BK to give me the latest versions of files that I > haven't edited, and allow me to do a merge on the files that I have > edited, without checking my files in. Checking them in requires that I > specify changelog comments, and I don't want to do that until I'm done > with everything. Bitkeeper organizes deltas in changesets. A changeset is one ore more delta grouped together. On changeset depend on another. So you can't just say I want all the upstream changes for 'files' I didn't modfiy. You have two possibilites to solve it: a) you ci your local changes. bk ci file b) you revert back to original: bk unedit file > I can't imagine ever wanting to do that, but I guess I just don't > "get" bitkeeper. You never experienced a broken upstream repository and wanted to go back? That's what revision control is about. IMHO. Thomas _______________________________________________ Bitkeeper-users mailing list [email protected] http://bitmover.com/mailman/listinfo/bitkeeper-users To unsubscribe from this list, go to the above URL, follow instruction at the bottom of the web page.