Re: bkd does not serve html on Windows
Måns Rullgård <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.version-control.bitkeeper.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Larry McVoy <[email protected]> writes: > On Thu, Sep 16, 2004 at 09:03:33AM -0700, Kevin P. Fleming wrote: >> Bob Burres wrote: >> >> >BK/Web is an add on that is only available with the commercial version of >> >BitKeeper. For the Open Source community we offer bkbits which allows you >> >to provide a web portal to your project. >> >> When did this policy change? I'm running bk-3.2.3 here (free version), >> and BK/Web works just fine for me. > > I think there is some confusion, let me clear it up. BK/Web is an > unsupported feature in the free version which is probably why Bob thought > it didn't work. It really doesn't work under some circumstances, you > have to be running it on a public port that anyone can reach and use > and you have to have not disabled clones/pulls on that port. In other > words, you can use BK/Web for free but if and only if you are working > 100% out in the open. Otherwise it won't work. > > We tend to discourage this use of BK for two reasons: > - We would prefer you host your source on bkbits.net if you want a > public place to host it. We get some benefit from that, it stresses > BK more to have lots of data and lots of users, and it is of some > marketing value as well. I host my projects locally and mirror them to bkbits.net. Accessing my local BK/Web is faster than bkbits.net, and a little redundancy never hurts. -- Måns Rullgård [email protected] _______________________________________________ Bitkeeper-users mailing list [email protected] http://bitmover.com/mailman/listinfo/bitkeeper-users To unsubscribe from this list, go to the above URL, follow instruction at the bottom of the web page.