Re: something equivalent to "bk ls"?

Wayne Scott <[email protected]> Thu, 28 Oct 2004 15:20:05 -0500 (EST)
Newsgroups gmane.comp.version-control.bitkeeper.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
From: "Robert P. J. Day" <[email protected]>
> 
> but that's recursive, which is not what i want.  (it's also confusing
> that the "bk helptool" for "sfiles" shows a syntax of
> 
>   bk [-r] sfiles ...

You are right showing the -r on the sfiles manpage is completely
bogus. We will get that fixed.

Here is exactly that 'bk -r command' does.  If gets translated to:
     cd `bk root`
     bk sfiles | bk command -

so, of cource, it doesn't make sense to call 'bk sfiles' itself with
the 'bk -r' option. (but it does work)


And you are correct that bk sfiles is recursive by default.  We are
planning on adding a -1 option to sfiles to turn off that behavior.
In the meanwhile it seems you can do this:

   # list all gfiles in current directory (ugly I know)
   find SCCS -name 's.*' | bk sfiles -g -

-Wayne


_______________________________________________
Bitkeeper-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://bitmover.com/mailman/listinfo/bitkeeper-users
To unsubscribe from this list, go to the above URL, follow instruction at the bottom of the web page.