Re: something equivalent to "bk ls"?
Wayne Scott <[email protected]> Thu, 28 Oct 2004 15:20:05 -0500 (EST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.version-control.bitkeeper.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
From: "Robert P. J. Day" <[email protected]> > > but that's recursive, which is not what i want. (it's also confusing > that the "bk helptool" for "sfiles" shows a syntax of > > bk [-r] sfiles ... You are right showing the -r on the sfiles manpage is completely bogus. We will get that fixed. Here is exactly that 'bk -r command' does. If gets translated to: cd `bk root` bk sfiles | bk command - so, of cource, it doesn't make sense to call 'bk sfiles' itself with the 'bk -r' option. (but it does work) And you are correct that bk sfiles is recursive by default. We are planning on adding a -1 option to sfiles to turn off that behavior. In the meanwhile it seems you can do this: # list all gfiles in current directory (ugly I know) find SCCS -name 's.*' | bk sfiles -g - -Wayne _______________________________________________ Bitkeeper-users mailing list [email protected] http://bitmover.com/mailman/listinfo/bitkeeper-users To unsubscribe from this list, go to the above URL, follow instruction at the bottom of the web page.