netbsd 1.6 vs 2.0?
Larry McVoy <[email protected]> Wed, 29 Dec 2004 17:44:16 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.version-control.bitkeeper.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
For all you netbsd-ers out there, I installed 2.0 today to figure out if
compiling on 1.6 would work for 2.0. It does for bk but not for the
GUI tools. Check this out, can you explain the problem:
netbsd2 /tmp/bk-3.2.x ldd /usr/X11R6/bin/xterm
/usr/X11R6/bin/xterm:
[some stuff removed for clarity]
-lX11.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6
-lc.12 => /usr/lib/libc.so.12
netbsd2 /tmp/bk-3.2.x ldd `bk bin`/gui/bin/bkgui
/usr/libexec/bitkeeper/gui/bin/bkgui:
-lX11.6 => not found
-lc.12 => /usr/lib/libc.so.12
So why is the gui image not finding X11?
We'll upgrade to netbsd 2.0 if that's the right answer (peppy little OS, I
like it) but in general we like sitting on older stuff because that enables
the most releases on which BK works. I'll bet anything that a binary built
on 2.0 won't run on 1.6, that would be expecting too much.
Any ideas? Anyone care about netbsd 1.6?
_______________________________________________
Bitkeeper-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://bitmover.com/mailman/listinfo/bitkeeper-users
To unsubscribe from this list, go to the above URL, follow instruction at the bottom of the web page.