Re: patch for pam authentication in cvs

Kevin Wang wrote:

> From Brian Murphy
>  
>
>>>Brian Murphy writes:
>>>      
>>>
>>>We try not to throw things into CVS just because someone thinks it would
>>>be a good idea.  When lots of people tell us they are successfully using
>>>a patch and would like it to be included in the standard distribution,
>>>then we consider it.  (Of course, if some *developer* thinks it's a good
>>>idea, the process does get considerably sortened.)  Now that we have an
>>>"experimental" branch, there's a better chance of things getting
>>>accepted there.
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>Chalk me up for one more supporting vote for getting SOME sort of pam
>support in the base product.  I don't care where, how, or when; that's
>your job!
>
>   -
>  
>
OK. Taking a hint I have just applied to be a developer.

/Brian