Re: PAM authentication patch - v2
Derek Robert Price <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.version-control.cvs.bugs |
|---|---|
| Organization | Ximbiot <http://ximbiot.com> |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Brian Murphy wrote:
>> Is the check for `if (!ui)' really necessary here? In the
>> HAVE_BROKEN_PAM_APPDATA case does PAM really _sometimes_ pass the
>> pointer back?
>>
> I don't know. I got this from the apache pam authentication module. I
> would guess there is
> a patch from Sun which fixes the problem which some users have
> applied. Perhaps I should
> remove all this stuff until someone runs into this problem on a real
> system?
Maybe. You said Solaris 2.6. Has Sun distributed patches? How is
Apache detecting the situation? I assume they use configure?
> Thanks for the comments.
Thanks your work on the patch. :)
Derek
--
*8^)
Email: [email protected]
Get CVS support at <http://ximbiot.com>!
--
Man who run behind car get exhausted.