Re: PAM authentication patch - v2

Brian Murphy <[email protected]> writes:

> Mark D. Baushke wrote:
> 
> >I doubt I can convince you of how evil it is to send passwords in the
> >clear for your :pserver: connections to cvs. I just shudder to think of
> >folks seeing that cvs support PAM and thinking for some reason that it
> >is not leaking their passwords in a large number of ways.
> >
> >
> PAM also works with telnet. I don't think anyone thinks a PAM enabled login
> via telnet is any more secure than an ordinary passwd based login.

Some telnet versions allow for encryption either using SSL or are
GSSAPI-based.

In addition, there are many security pages documenting the 'evils' of
using telnet and suggesting that all right-minded people move to a
secure remote connection mechanism of some kind.

It should also be noted that folks have spend a bit of effort trying to
remove security flaws from telnet and telnetd and that a similar such
effort has not been contemplated for cvs which is inherently NOT secure.

	-- Mark