Re: PAM authentication patch - v2

[email protected] (Larry Jones)
Newsgroups gmane.comp.version-control.cvs.bugs
Message-ID <[email protected]> 
Derek Robert Price writes:
> 
> Speaking of committing, if I read the discussion correctly and noone 
> changed their mind without saying so, we're still at +1 developer votes:

I'm fence sitting.  As I see more and more problems with
incompatibilities between various PAM implementations, I'm becomming
more and more sympathetic to Greg's attitude that we shouldn't be in the
authorization business at all.  If you want PAM, use ssh (or rsh if you
must), not pserver.

-Larry Jones

I've changed my mind, Hobbes.  People are scum. -- Calvin
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.