Re: getline & getline_safe
Paul Eggert <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.gnulib.bugs,gmane.comp.version-control.cvs.bugs |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Derek Robert Price <[email protected]> writes: > Incidentally, this implies having a getnline.c file which is always > compiled, and possibly which getline.c is dependent on. Is this > reasonable? Sounds reasonable to me. > The long run alternative is to get getndelim() & getnline() into > libc. I haven't really dealt with libc before. Is _this_ > reasonable? Is this likely? Maybe, maybe not. Let's try gnulib first. If only CVS uses it, then perhaps it's not worth worrying about for libc.