RE: Building CVS on Windows is broken...again

Derek Robert Price wrote:
> Sent: Monday, February 16, 2004 11:43 PM
> To: Conrad T. Pino
> >I only have Visual C++ 6.0 and various Borland C/C++ compilers.
> >How much flexibility do we have deviating away from Visual C++ 5?
> 
> 
> Well, fact of the matter is, I only have VC++ 6.0 too, so 
> unless someone
> who has VC++ 5.0 wants to help out, we'll have to drop 
> support for VC++ 5.0.
I could probably dig up a copy of VC 5.0, but is it worth it? What's the
reason behind using VC5 as the officially supported version?

-- 
Jim Hyslop 
Senior Software Designer 
Leitch Technology International Inc. (<http://www.leitch.com/>) 
Columnist, C/C++ Users Journal (<http://www.cuj.com/experts>)