Re: Performance of cvs
"Mark D. Baushke" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.version-control.cvs.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Arthur Barrett <[email protected]> writes: > I think some proxy work was also done in CVS 1.12 but I'm not sure if > it was a full read/write through proxy. Yes. cvs 1.12.13 has a full write-through proxy. It assumes CVSup or similar mechanism would maintain the secondary servers and that the primary server would be used for write operations directed at the otherwise read-only secondary. I am not sure if anyone is actively using this feature at this time. -- Mark
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 186 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFJx4nQCg7APGsDnFERAmZLAKC2o+1Musnu3XcRHOrC3O2l4bc9PQCgp4rH OaYCGOnbdrnBt+Q7yE5P5RI= =iSO3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----