Re: Performance of cvs
Yaron Yogev <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.version-control.cvs.general |
|---|---|
| Organization | http://groups.google.com |
| Message-ID | <be834b7d-b794-498d-932b-9ba324630780@o36g2000yqh.googlegroups.com> |
Mark, In Jungo we used the write-through proxy method for a while in a remote branch (later this branch was shut off). -- Yaron Yogev IT Software Developer Jungo Software Technologies On Mar 23, 3:08 pm, "Mark D. Baushke" <[email protected]> wrote: > Arthur Barrett <[email protected]> writes: > > I think some proxy work was also done in CVS 1.12 but I'm not sure if > > it was a full read/write through proxy. > > Yes. cvs 1.12.13 has a full write-through proxy. It assumes CVSup or > similar mechanism would maintain the secondary servers and that the > primary server would be used for write operations directed at the > otherwise read-only secondary. > > I am not sure if anyone is actively using this feature at this time. > > -- Mark > > application_pgp-signature_part > < 1KViewDownload