Re: Is this the most official cvs mailing list?
Todd Denniston <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.version-control.cvs.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Arthur Barrett wrote, On 08/26/2009 02:04 AM: > Jirong and Bob, >>> Sorry to ask this question. I found this mailing list here, >>> but seems not much activity as I expected. > > Ahhh - you've presumably looked at the SVN mailing list and seen the 30+ > messages every day. You are right - this mailing list traffic is > comparably low. > > The correct explanation is one or more of these reasons: > A) CVS is easier to use than that other software, so people need to ask > less questions > B) CVS has less bugs than that other software, so people need to ask > less questions > C) People who use CVS know how to search the mailing list to find > previous answers, so do not have to ask the same questions each day > D) People who use CVS are more dedicated to the GNU philosophy and if > they find a problem, simply fix it and submit a patch rather than ask > why it doesn't work > E) People who use CVS can't be bothered writing e-mails, if it doesn't > work they just don't bother checking in > F) People who use CVS can (and do) read manuals > G) People who use CVS know the value of time and so are happy to pay the > authors to come on site and help Arthur, please be careful when you head off into the deep end of the funny pool, some might think you are still _very_ serious from H onwards. OH, and E seems a _little_ sketchy too. :) I did enjoy them, but I thought they might be more confusing than funny to the less initiated. -- Todd Denniston Crane Division, Naval Surface Warfare Center (NSWC Crane) Harnessing the Power of Technology for the Warfighter