Re: RFC: New Response type to aid rlog reponse parsing

Hi,

>I have documented this [1] for interested parties. It is a rather
>long-ish document. I have done my best to organize the information for
>easy digestion and reference.

how interesting. I=E2=80=99ve added a =E2=80=9Ccvs suck=E2=80=9D command to=
 the 1.12 flavour
shipped with MirBSD and Debian (current de-facto =E2=80=9Cupstream=E2=80=9D=
 of GNU
CVS as I seem to be the only one working on it) to download individual
,v files, but that would of course only work if the server supports it.

>Attached is a patch implementing LOGM change against cvs-1.11.23

I=E2=80=99ve looked at it and it=E2=80=99s trivial and probably correct eno=
ugh,
so I=E2=80=99ll patch my 1.12 branch similarily and add to the (in)=E2=80=
=9Csanity=E2=80=9D
testsuite. Then you=E2=80=99ll only have to convince the OpenCVS maintainer=
s
to adapt (if it still exists, that is, haven=E2=80=99t checked) and everyon=
e
is compatible.

Thanks,
//mirabilos
PS: Due to Google=E2=80=99s inability to honour basic Internet standards,
    direct messages from Googlemail to my eMail address are likely
    to not reach me, or only delayed by up to several weeks.
--=20
> Wish I had pine to hand :-( I'll give lynx a try, thanks.

Michael Schmitz on nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.ports.68k
a.k.a. {news.gmane.org/nntp}#news.gmane.linux.debian.ports.68k in pine