Re: Some Macros topic.

"Hiroaki Itoh" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.version-control.cvs.gui.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
It seems only (1-1) was appropreate for this list...
I had exposed newbie-wise... :-(

# (1-2): Because I didn't understand `virtual module' well.
# (2): Simply because of my misunderstanding.

--- In [email protected], "Oliver Giesen" <ogware@g...> 
wrote:
> Hmm, it'd be news to me that you could give a relative module 
path. Relative
> to what would that be?

getcwd.


>         Note though that even the Macros/Reload Macro item has 
some glitches
> still. Repeat it a few times and suddenly all macros are greyed 
out... I

I'm aware of it.


> > (4)I want `flexibility cvs add' Macro like RecursiveAddTk.py but 
no-
> > recurse.
> >    # I actually need `cvs add -ko'.
> 
> That's one for the issue tracker. What we really need is a full-
fledged Add

I think I'll regist to the tracker. (I can't find the same issue.
Please tell me if there is already that.)
By the way, this feature should be supported by which macros or
WinCvs itself, you think?


> > P.S.
> > w.r.t TCL on cygwin problem:
> >   * I think at least we should not load any DLL if the settings
> >     (WinCvs -> TCL DLL) is wrong.
> 
> Most of the time it works best if the settings are just kept 
blank. However,

I'm thinking `blank' and `wrong' separately.

I think it is one of the reason for people's anger that they cann't
control the behaviour completely by changing the preference.
For example, if the preference is `tcl90.dll'(of cource it isn't
on your system), WinCvs will try to load tcl84.dll after all. 
This behaviour is very confusable, I think.


> it might indeed be more transparent if the checkbox was initially 
checked by
> default and the entry simply read "tcl84.dll" (or whichever was 
the one that
:
> the Python DLL.

Checkbox idea is also on my mind. I think `transparent' is
important, especially in the case which it is for an external
(and arbitrary) DLL.


> >   * It would be nice if WinCvs had the setting for process local
> >     PATH environment variable.
> 
> I think the above would take care of that, or did I maybe 
misunderstand you?

If my broken English didn't confuse you, maybe you didn't 
misunderstand me.

I thought if I could remove unnecessary path by the preference,
but indeed we should take care, and it might be complex...




 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
     http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cvsgui-dev/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
     [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
     http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.