Re: [viewvc-users] When and why did "allow_tar" get pulled out?

Nico Kadel-Garcia <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.version-control.cvs.viewcvs.user
Message-ID <ce6304781001290835p4ed0f93dkfb8f1752c3923e08__18728.5780128606$1264782929$gmane$org@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 9:28 AM, C. Michael Pilato <[email protected]> wrote:
> Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>> I used to use "allow_tar" in viewvc-1.0.9 to allow tarball
>> downloading, to avoid needing to install Subversion clients to access
>> test tarballs. This was apparently yanked out at 1.1.0, although the
>> help pages still reflect the presence of the "Download tarball"
>> option.
>>
>> The consistent and confusing labeling of "allow_tar" versus its
>> description as "Download tarball" in the documentation was a minor
>> issue. But yanking out the utility without updating the documentation
>> is... an unpleasant surprise. Why was it pulled? Would it be possible
>> to have restored as an option?
>
> It wasn't pulled -- it was merely relocated.  Rather than have allow_markup,
> allow_tar and allow_annotate, plus the new allow_checkout and allow_roots
> options needed, I unified these into a single new 'allowed_views' option in
> the 1.1.0 line.  That little tidbit didn't make it into the release notes,
> but is noted in the "Upgrading from 1.0" portion of the "Upgrading HOW-TO"
> doc[1].

*THANK* you. That makes sense.

> (Heheh... I just noticed that the example immediately after that portion of
> doc errantly still refers to the allow_tar configuration option.  Sheesh.)
>
> As for the online help ... that stuff is atrociously out of date.  I'd
> welcome any suggestions you could offer on updating those docs (over on
> [email protected], please).  Thanks!

I'll send a followup there, but I just started a new job, so I'm short
on cycles myself to do it.

------------------------------------------------------
http://viewvc.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=4255&dsMessageId=2443057

To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [[email protected]].
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.