RE: [viewvc-users] Security certificate issues [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.version-control.cvs.viewcvs.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <8B2245497B7F9348B262E7DF858E0B7237EC5E3EA9__46342.8489318632$1297655543$gmane$org@EXCCR01.agso.gov.au> |
On Saturday, 12 February 2011 3:36 AM C. Michael Pilato wrote: > On 02/10/2011 10:00 PM, [email protected] wrote: > >> It doesn't appear that you are requiring login credentials > for your ViewVC > >> site, so is it necessary that you expose it via SSL at all? > > > > We will require login to be able to submit to the > repository. Hence the > > SSL. Is there a way of configuring ViewVC that allows people to look > > without using https but to submit they have to login using https? > > It's quite common for folks to setup Subversion such that > anonymous read > access is over HTTP, and authenticated read/write access is > via HTTPS only. > (I actually really like that paradigm, and prefer to use it myself.) > That is great news. I have configured apache to have ViewVC on http and subversion https. That is exactly what I wanted. > But ViewVC doesn't allow for "submit" -- it's a repository > *browser* only. > So if all the repository contents are world-readable anyway, > then there's > nothing to be gained by offering your ViewVC service over > SSL. Meanwhile, > you're incurring a) this annoying certificate error and b) > the calculation > overhead of encryption/decryption. > Yes. This makes sense and so the configuration for ViewVC on http works well. Thanks for all your help. John > -- > C. Michael Pilato <[email protected]> > CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Distributed > Development On Demand > > ------------------------------------------------------ http://viewvc.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=4255&dsMessageId=2703776 To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [[email protected]].