Re: Betr.: CVSNT to CVS
Tony Hoyle <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.version-control.cvs.windows-nt.user |
|---|---|
| Organization | cvsnt.org news server |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Andreas Krey wrote: > ...and get the flames when the next merge fails because of the > mergeinfo that wasn't created because he carried over the files > by hand. Depends if the directories are ever intended to be mergable. If they're not, then both options are equivalent. > On the other hand 'svn copy' basically only exists to create tags > and branches anyway. Who ever needs two directories that are > mergeable to each other within a project tree? It happens. eg. customer specific modules, one per directory. You'd copy those to keep them mergable and make the customer specific changes - if the base module changes you merge from one to the other. svn suports this. cvsnt could check that out but couldn't create the copies, or do the merges. IIRC tfs could do it as well. Tony _______________________________________________ cvsnt mailing list [email protected] http://www.cvsnt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cvsnt Upgrade to CVS Suite for more features and support: http://march-hare.com/cvsnt/