Re: so long and thanks for all the darcs

On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 1:19 AM, Ben Franksen <[email protected]> wrote:
> But you /can/ work in the same way with darcs: just don't (q)uit, rather
> say (d)one. Then use 'darcs amend' to add more changes or 'darcs amend
> --unrecord' to remove changes. There is also the --edit-long-comment
> option for amend.

Yes, I also often worked this way.  I don't know why I didn't use it
more than I did though... maybe because of:

> We could improve the workflow a bit by presenting the changes in the
> opposite order with 'amend --unrecord', so it acts more like an undo.

Yes, I have definitely wanted exactly this feature more than once.
I'm all for it.