Re: How to extend a patch theory to fully commute

Am 01.07.20 um 17:13 schrieb James Cook:
> On Wed, 1 Jul 2020 at 10:21, Ben Franksen <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Am 01.07.20 um 05:09 schrieb James Cook:
>>> The context address /points to/ a context c if there exists a
>>> permutation of (Qi) such that all the patches with names in X come
>>> before patches with names in Y, and c is the after-context of the k-th
>>> patch in the sequence (equivalently, the before-context of the (k+1)-th
>>> patch), where k = |X|.
>>
>> and later:
>>
>>> Definition: A context address (a, b, (Qi), X, Y) is /minimal/ if it is
>>> impossible (in the primitive patch theory) to commute the sequence (Qi)
>>> so that it begins with a patch in X or ends with a patch in Y.
>>
>> Did you mix up X and Y here? I would have expected the sentence to say
>> "begins with a patch in Y or ends with a patch in X".
> 
> I think this part is correct as written. I added some more
> explanation: https://hub.darcs.net/falsifian/misc-pub/patch/3bf868962261b8b275f81a82136106ee4c444dd1
> 
> The point of minimal addresses is that they "point" to contexts that
> aren't already part of the primitive patch theory. If a patch in X
> could be moved to the start, or a patch in Y could be moved to the
> end, then the address could be made even more minimal by leaving out
> that patch (the more minimal address would be called a
> "simplification" as defined in Chapter 4).

Okay, I think I got it now. Thanks for the explanation.

Cheers
Ben