Re: Darcs equivalent of force-pushing and branching

Ben Franksen writes:

 > It depends on what you mean with "patches". From a user perspective, it 
 > is indeed true that a branch is a set of patches. My response was about 
 > the implementation which has a different view.

This is very generous of you.  I did indeed mean the implementation,
and I was just wrong.  You are also correct that "patch" itself is
ambiguous, but I think that's just natural language for you.  In the
event, both you and James read me correctly, and

		 that's what I like about this list!

:-)

Thanks to all for unendingly interesting discussions, and a deep well
of good humor and tempered responses!

Steve