Re: missing branch certs?
Stephen Leake <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.version-control.monotone.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Richard Levitte <[email protected]> writes: > This came in with a merge (57a4f033e3f705942e8dde95297f451c8114d76f). > My guess is the the branch that the revisions you found are in > (net.venge.monotone.monotone-0.99) wasn't part of the branch patterns > when the merge got pushed. Still, the revisions themselves get pushed. Ah, that makes sense. So to find the nominal branch of such a revision, I could look at its parents. It's actually not a problem, now that DVC can handle missing branch certs. > stephen_leake> mtn: total problems detected: 69 (30 serious) > stephen_leake> mtn: error: serious problems detected Given the above, perhaps missing branch certs should not be called "serious" errors? As long as they are not heads, perhaps. -- -- Stephe