Re: GPLv3 code in monotone
Thomas Keller <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.version-control.monotone.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Am 19.05.11 16:59, schrieb Zack Weinberg: Nice to read you! :) > I think that migration to GPLv3 remains premature at this time, and we > should relicense the v3 files down to v2. +1 from me as well. We probably need to create a patch release with this change, so downstream's license issues are actually reflected properly, right? I don't want to "temporarily" make the package GPLv3 and wait for the next release to "downgrade" it again to GPLv2... do we actually have anything for a 1.0.1 release beside this? I came across a few Win32 issues lately, but I have no time to look after them. Thomas. -- GPG-Key 0x160D1092 | [email protected] | http://thomaskeller.biz Please note that according to the EU law on data retention, information on every electronic information exchange might be retained for a period of six months or longer: http://www.vorratsdatenspeicherung.de/?lang=en _______________________________________________ Monotone-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 259 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk3VVZoACgkQaf7NlBYNEJJnUgCg5Ly19amNAoJ9BbR5a5b6H/rq Lt8AnjA6zX38wmB8o5QUs4tRxPVxoEed =9a4k -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----