Re: GPLv3 code in monotone
Hendrik Boom <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.version-control.monotone.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 07:18:21PM -0700, Zack Weinberg wrote: > On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 6:51 PM, Hendrik Boom <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Switching to GPL3 would make us license-incompatible with a large body > >> of code (everything under a copyleft that isn't v3-compatible, in > >> particular, code under v2-only). It would also make us > >> license-compatible with a large body of code (anything that adds > >> restrictions that are okay with v3 but not v2). > > > > GLP2+ is compatible with GPL2. > > GLP2+ is compatible with GPL3. > > I said v2-only. Yes, we're in agreement. The v2-only item was at the end of my first sentence. The mtn code should be GPL2+, mentioned at the start of both sentences. Sorry if that wasn't clear. -- hendrik