Re: GPLv3 code in monotone
Zack Weinberg <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.version-control.monotone.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 8:09 AM, Hendrik Boom <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 07:18:21PM -0700, Zack Weinberg wrote: >> On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 6:51 PM, Hendrik Boom <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Switching to GPL3 would make us license-incompatible with a large body >> >> of code (everything under a copyleft that isn't v3-compatible, in >> >> particular, code under v2-only). It would also make us >> >> license-compatible with a large body of code (anything that adds >> >> restrictions that are okay with v3 but not v2). >> > >> > GLP2+ is compatible with GPL2. >> > GLP2+ is compatible with GPL3. >> >> I said v2-only. > > Yes, we're in agreement. The v2-only item was at the end of my first > sentence. The mtn code should be GPL2+, mentioned at the start of both > sentences. I misunderstood you. Sorry about that. I agree with your assessment. _______________________________________________ Monotone-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel