Re: New branch name with no other changes

Hendrik Boom <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.version-control.monotone.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 02:14:16PM -0400, Hendrik Boom wrote,

but forgot to mention he was using mtn 1.0:

> I checked out a new workspace, and I want to check it in again unchenged 
> with a new branch name  -- the one I want to use to make changes.  I'd 
> like to make it clear that the new branch is starting in the same state 
> as the current head in the old one.
> 
> But when I try to check in, it fails:
> 
> hendrik@notlookedfor:~/fanfic/theShadowChronicles-MarkMacKinnon/edited$ 
> mtn commit 
> --branch=com.pooq.hendrik.othersfanfic.theShadowChronicles.cleanup
> mtn: misuse: no changes to commit
> 
> Well, yes, there were no changes in any of the files, but the branch was 
> different.
> 
> Is there some conceptual reason why a branch name change should not be 
> enough to do a commit?
> 
> Of course I can get on with my work by making a small inessential 
> change, but this is inelegant.  I'll do it, though, when time presses. 
> 
> -- hendrik
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Monotone-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.