Re: Status of blue sky ideas?

CooSoft Support <[email protected]> writes:

[...]

> Git is far too complex in certain areas and it's easy to loose
> stuff.

Too complex?  In some sense, yes.  The set of commands is rather random,
not consistent (it's obvious that much of it grew rather than being
designed).  I disagree that it's easy to lose things: it's easy to throw
things away, but once you've committed something it's difficult to lose
it (unless you remove .git, which I guess isn't impossible coming from
monotone where the database is outside your checkout).

[...]

> Perhaps more plugging of mtn on the internet?.... To get the git
> rejects?

Make sure you've got something to offer.  Back in the day there weren't
many practical DVCSs, but nowadays I'd guess that fossil would be a more
likely refuge for people who don't like git or mercurial.  (Not sure who
bazaar attracts; I find it peculiarly opaque.)

[...]