Re: nvm.lua-5.2 failing on mingw

Richard Levitte <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.version-control.monotone.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
In message <[email protected]> on Mon, 07 May 2012 12:36:10 +0100, Stephen Leake <[email protected]> said:

stephen_leake> Stephen Leake <[email protected]> writes:
stephen_leake> 
stephen_leake> > Completely reinstalling mingw, using an older installer that has g++
stephen_leake> > 4.5.2, fixed this particular problem (running 'make check' now).
stephen_leake> >
stephen_leake> > So apparently g++ 4.6.2 has problems with exceptions on Mingw. Cygwin is
stephen_leake> > still at 4.5.3; I don't think Debian is at 4.6 yet. So perhaps this is
stephen_leake> > not surprising.
stephen_leake> 
stephen_leake> 'make check' now completed.
stephen_leake> 
stephen_leake> tester and unit tests all pass.
stephen_leake> 
stephen_leake> func tests had one failure; netsync_key_hooks didn't get the expected
stephen_leake> return value from the server when sent SIGTERM. I think this is a known
stephen_leake> bug in MinGW, so we should skip that test.
stephen_leake> 
stephen_leake> All of the extra tests failed, as on the previous release. The failure
stephen_leake> is 'attempt to call global 'mtn_setup' (a nil value)', so there's
stephen_leake> something fundamental wrong in extra test driver.
stephen_leake> 
stephen_leake> In sum; as far as Cygwin and MinGW are concerned, nvm.lua-5.2 can be
stephen_leake> merged to main.

Wait, you're saying all of "extra" is failing?  I definitely don't get
that on my (Linux) box...

I'm also a bit surprised that we consider failures with the "extra"
part ok.

Other than that, I agree that nvm.lua-5.2 should be merged into nvm.

-- 
Richard Levitte                         [email protected]
                                        http://richard.levitte.org/

"Life is a tremendous celebration - and I'm invited!"
-- from a friend's blog, translated from Swedish
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.