Re: netsync over ssh revisited

Richard Levitte <[email protected]> writes:

> So I wonder, has anyone else already played with having netsync
> tunneled over ssh but otherwise working exactly like the usual mtn:
> schema?  (in other words, it still requires a mtn running as server on
> the remote end)

I have not tried it, but you can probably get there with ssh port forwarding.

> My other question is, is there any reason why monotone shouldn't
> support that?  A mtn+ssh: schema, say?  Technically, it shouldn't be
> harder than supporting the current ssh: schema.

There was discussion of using ssl, a while back.

-- 
-- Stephe