Re: netsync over ssh revisited
Stephen Leake <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.version-control.monotone.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Richard Levitte <[email protected]> writes: > In message <[email protected]> on Thu, 06 Sep 2012 > 04:56:45 -0400, Stephen Leake <[email protected]> said: > > stephen_leake> Attempting to generalize/abstract a naming convention: > stephen_leake> > stephen_leake> ssh {host} socat - UNIX-CONNECT:{path} > stephen_leake> > stephen_leake> I'm not clear what's a protocol and what's a transport here; it seems to > stephen_leake> me the actual data exchange protocol is always mtn (that defines how to > stephen_leake> exchange certs, keys, revisions, and possibly authentication), and both > stephen_leake> ssh and unix domain sockets are transports. > > You're right, it was poorly expressed. Say {transpport}+{tunnel} The Unix domain socket is not tunneling the ssh transport; socat is bridging the two transports. I'd have to see a list of all the protocols mtn supports to try to come up with a reasonable classification. Which is what your manual update will provide, so I think that's the place to start. -- -- Stephe