Re: netsync over ssh revisited

Richard Levitte <[email protected]> writes:

> stephen_leake> I'd have to see a list of all the protocols mtn supports to try to come
> stephen_leake> up with a reasonable classification. Which is what your manual update
> stephen_leake> will provide, so I think that's the place to start.
>
> mtn:    (netsync via tcp)
> file:   (netsync via --stdio)    
> ssh:    (which is basically file: tunneled through ssh)
> ssh+ux: (Unix domain socket via ssh)
> local:  (kind sorta supported, it's supported by netxx and can be used
>          as a argument to --bind, and is the way a server should be
>          set up to be accessible via ssh+ux:)

plus proposed ssh+local: (ssh + tcp socket)

I don't see much of a pattern here, no need to rename ssh+ux

-- 
-- Stephe