Re: recent Botan changes?

Richard Hopkins <[email protected]> writes:

>>> monotone configure says we support Botan > 1.6.3, which is apparently
>>> no longer true.
>
>> We should fix this then.
>
> I successfully compile and run monotone (head) with botan 1.6.4 on
> SUSE Enterprise, and from memory 1.8.x and 1.10.x on OpenSUSE/Windows.

How recent a head?

This is the revision that failed for me:

   7282e7ba458b5e92f9c3850486c7b1c0df13c951
   2013-03-20T11:53:14  [email protected]
     * src/merge_content.cc (get_dropped_details): replace rev_id with uncommon_ancestors, lca; much more efficient search

I'm guessing the problem is introduced in:

   9ff6e41adc6f40ae054fb4487f356bf69324dbdb
   2013-03-17T10:14:12  [email protected]
     Add conditional code using Botan 1.10 specific API. This prevents

Maybe my actual problem is that the condition #defines are not set
properly on my Red Hat system when using Botan 1.8.3; I did not
investigate.

-- 
-- Stephe