Re: status of release 1.1
Markus Wanner <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.version-control.monotone.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 05/04/2014 12:06 AM, Thomas Keller wrote:
> So I guess the timestamp that it supposed to handle
> ("1901-12-13T20:45:51") should not be acceptable with a 32 bit time_t
> and it should fail in such a case.
Exactly.
While time_t itself is 64-bits, some mktime internals are not. Maybe
Apple just doesn't care about dates prior 1902. Maybe I should have done
the same rather than the extensive check. It's not like people use
monotone to handle such dates...
Regards
Markus Wanner
_______________________________________________
Monotone-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 242 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Icedove - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEAREDAAYFAlNlabcACgkQsPwMloDjyo/1YQCggGF/QZK4bjFUJJRffMFY4AwL xQ0An1bEAA2a3OcOWSPIc4pn1lzv8oQ9 =thxA -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----