Re: C++11

Hi Markus!

Markus Wanner schrieb:
> Obviously, the former offers little benefit: We could possibly add minor
> #ifdef'd optimizations. For example using perfect forwarding and move
> constructors to avoid some copying if C++11 is used.
> 
> The latter seems much more interesting, but is a much heftier change as
> well. Before I proceed with that branch, I'd like to get some feedback
> and opinions.

Since I'm not developing with C++ anymore on a daily basis, would you
mind to give guys like me some examples / judgement why monotone should
switch to C++11? I could think of having less code in monotone because
more is taken care of already in the stdlib, but some examples would be
nice.

Thanks!
Thomas.

-- 
GPG-Key 0x160D1092 | [email protected] | http://thomaskeller.biz
Please note that according to the EU law on data retention, information
on every electronic information exchange might be retained for a period
of six months or longer: http://www.vorratsdatenspeicherung.de/?lang=en

_______________________________________________
Monotone-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAlNxxNkACgkQaf7NlBYNEJL16wCg+mtPnPDoblQJbtmI8MIK4SOd
vVgAn3QCGBW8RiTZv2uqV6PmxY1CRLmy
=W2EZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----