Re: rcs-5.8-1 on HP-UX 11.31
Thien-Thi Nguyen <[email protected]> Thu, 05 Jul 2012 14:10:13 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.version-control.rcs.bugs |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
() Paul Ackersviller <[email protected]> () Mon, 2 Jul 2012 17:19:12 +0000 Alright, I took the 5.8.1 tag and got all the same results -- everything compiles and the tests all pass. Cool. Looks to me like HP is being a little extra helpful in giving warnings even for code that can be compile-time optimized out. Would the non-initialization only run on MS-DOS, or does that include modern Windows too? I don't know. It all depends on what the configure script is able to discern, which i am at a loss to characterize for either of those systems, not having access to them. > One other thing, in case you care, I also ran the tests with memory > leak checking. Following is the report for whatever it's worth. > > [3 warnings] > > Hmm, could it be possible that the obstacks RCS uses is confusing > the memory leak checking program? (What would that be, btw?) I think it's called real-time-checking, but isn't a separate product that I'm aware of, just bundled with HP's compiler. OK. I'll keep that in mind. A while back i remember Paul Eggert found (via valgrind) some latent bugs, which i had initially dismissed due to ignorance of valgrind. This situation is similar and i want to avoid making that mistake again, so could you please point me to some information on this program as well as how it was run? One additional question I just remembered -- is it normal now to require GNU make? Most autoconf-generated builds traditionally suppored sysv make as well. Is this changing now? I don't think RCS requires GNU make, actually. Am i missing something?