Re: RCS-5.8.2 Re: rcs-5.7.96 build feedback
Thien-Thi Nguyen <[email protected]> Sun, 03 Aug 2014 08:44:11 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.version-control.rcs.bugs |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
() Paul Eggert <[email protected]> () Sat, 02 Aug 2014 10:19:19 -0700 Unfortunately GCC 3.4.3 is the standard GCC version that is shipped as part of Solaris 10. It's helpful to have RCS work even when compiled with 3.4.3, as it's often quite a pain to download and install a newer compiler. Although i'm against this kind of Postel-accomodation in principle, i suppose Solaris 10 is not going to upgrade its default-shipped GCC anytime soon. How long is this platform estimated to be viable? How about we leave the patch applied, but make a note to un-snarl things for some later time, either a fixed number of years, or earlier should Solaris 10 become more sane (or die completely). The patch is trivial, so this shouldn't be much of a maintenance burden. I ported RCS to Solaris 10 (there were two other minor glitches) and applied the attached patch to the "p" branch of the RCS sources on Savannah. I hope that's the right branch for this sort of thing; if not please feel free to move it. Thank you. I confirm "p" is correct. I think "porting" is not quite right, however -- this kind of change is more "relaxing". -- Thien-Thi Nguyen GPG key: 4C807502 (if you're human and you know it) read my lisp: (responsep (questions 'technical) (not (via 'mailing-list))) => nil
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 197 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlPd2j0ACgkQZwMiJEyAdQLPLwCg1/M84JMdE2w/KS4jnFJaeu9P 8fgAoIe3bdT20sZQXmhQ1dKLUyYk6pRm =tQRY -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----