Re: proxy server

Kenneth Angell <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.version-control.sourcegear-vault.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
The original poster is using his Vault on a non-standard port and at a 
client site with proxy.  If he was using the standard port 80 this 
probably would not be a problem.  Since he does not have control over 
the proxy, I think he is lucky it works at all.

Ken Angell
Application Architect
NET-Architect

Metro Sauper wrote:

> We use the following configuration:
>  
> client -> ISA server -> NAT Router -> {internet} -> NAT Router -> 
> Vault Server
>  
> The Vault Server is also an ISA server for the rest of the office 
> network.  The actual Vault SQL database is on a server behind the 
> Vault Server.
>  
> We only allow secure (https) connections to the vault application on 
> the server.
>  
> We have never had a problem with this setup.  I've never even 
> considered that it might not work.  Isn't one of the main reasons for 
> using the http protocol to take advantage of the in-place enterprise 
> infrastructure support for it?
>  
>  
> Best regards,
>  
> Metro.
>  
> -----------
> Metro T. Sauper, Jr.
> President
> Sauper Associates, Inc.
> 221 County House Road
> Suite D
> Sewell, NJ  08080
>  
> V: 856.228.5300
> F: 856.228.2311
>  
>
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     *From:* [email protected]
>     [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of
>     *Steven Buxton
>     *Sent:* Wednesday, January 07, 2004 10:25 AM
>     *To:* Eric Sink; [email protected]
>     *Subject:* RE: [vault-list] proxy server
>
>     I access mine through an ISA proxy.  Most of the time my enviro
>     looks like Client -> ISA -> Router -> ISA - Vault.  Works like a
>     champ.  Never had any issues.
>      
>     Steven
>
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     *From:* [email protected] on behalf of Eric Sink
>     *Sent:* Wed 1/7/2004 9:42 AM
>     *To:* [email protected]
>     *Subject:* RE: [vault-list] proxy server
>
>
>     Hmmm.  I am having two reactions to your note:
>
>     First, I'm surprised that this is working at all.
>
>     Second, I'm curious why you are getting that
>     particular symptom.
>
>     But mostly, I'm just surprised that it works at
>     all with a proxy server.  Is anyone here actually
>     using Vault regularly with a proxy server?  IIRC,
>     this is not something we would consider a
>     "supported" configuration.
>
>     Anyway, as to your actual problem:  I don't suppose
>     there is something in your proxy server which is
>     configured to timeout sockets after one minute?  ;-)
>
>     AFIAK, there is no timeout in Vault which is 60
>     seconds long.
>
>     --
>     Eric Sink
>     Software Craftsman
>     http://software.ericsink.com/
>
>     -----Original Message-----
>     From: [email protected]
>     [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Brett
>     A Hoover
>     Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 4:45 PM
>     To: [email protected]
>     Subject: [vault-list] proxy server
>
>     I have Vault set up on a port other than 80.  Everything is working
>     correctly except when I'm on site at a vendor where they use a proxy
>     server.
>
>     In order to get Vault to function correctly, I need to start up Vault,
>     then fire up IE (with proxy enabled) and hit 
>     http://myurl:port/VaultService/VaultService.asmx -- which loads fine. 
>     Then I am able to login to Vault.  Without doing this, Vault
>     refuses the
>     connection.
>
>     Additionally, after a minute, any additional request to Vault gives me
>     the error message  that Vault couldn't perform the action.  My
>     connection to the server may have timed out.  I go to browser, refresh
>     the page, then retry the operation and everything works fine.
>
>     Despite it working, it is very annoying to have to refresh a web page
>     before performing a Vault operation.  And note, that the time out
>     can be
>     less than a minute.
>
>     Any ideas/suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
>
>     Thanks
>
>     Brett
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     vault-list mailing list
>     [email protected]
>     http://lists.sourcegear.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vault-list
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     vault-list mailing list
>     [email protected]
>     http://lists.sourcegear.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vault-list
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.