RE: Bug in automerge -- probably not
"Dan Schreiber" <[email protected]> Wed, 7 Apr 2004 13:45:58 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.version-control.sourcegear-vault.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
The problem isn't that Undo didn't merge correctly, but simply that the default for Undo Checkout is to leave the file as is, without reverting b= ack to the baseline file. You can change the default setting via the option= s dialog. Also, in the GUI client, the option is part of the Undo command dialog. In the IDE client, it is part of the "advanced" options provided= by Visual Studio - in some IDE versions this is located in the top left corn= er of the dialog. -Dan > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of John Saunder= s > Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 1:12 PM > To: 'Vault-List (E-mail)' > Subject: RE: [vault-list] Bug in automerge -- probably not > > > More info. Earlier today, a changed a file and then decided to do an "U= ndo > Checkout" on it. I just noticed in the GUI client that the file was mar= ked > as Renegade. I did a Show Differences and noticed that the difference w= as > the difference I was trying to back out! Apparently, the "Undo Checkout= " > failed to properly auto merge the version in the repository? > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > John Saunders=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 E-m= ail: [email protected] > Internet Engineer=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0= =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 Tel: +1 508 621 3818 > WWW: www.surfcontrol.com=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0= =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 Fax: +1 508 621 3921 > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 SurfControl - the World's #1 Web & E-mail Filtering Com= pany > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > > > -----Original Message----- > From: John Saunders > Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 17:50 > To: 'Vault-List (E-mail)' > Subject: RE: [vault-list] Bug in automerge -- probably not > > It seems that I replied incorrectly before: > ------------ > I see this problem very frequently. I think it may have to do with maki= ng > changes while working offline. I use my laptop as my primary developmen= t > machine. > > The workaround is to use the Status Search to check for any file in the > project that is not in the "Normal" state, and to treat it appropriatel= y. > The usual thing is to have Renegade files. I then have to do a > Check Out and > Check In. To solve problems with Old files, I do a Shift-Get Latest and > select Overwrite. > > Works every time. > > This is with Vault 1.2.3(758). > -------------- > > The new news is that it happened just now. I just opened a solution on = a > machine that hadn't opened it for weeks. Naturally, what was on > disk was not > the latest. I selected the solution in Solution Explorer and did a Get > Latest Version (Recursive). My solution file and the two project files = are > now "Renegade". All other files are in "Normal" state. > > So I did a recursive Get Latest from the client, and the three files we= re > still "Renegade". > > I then did a recursive Get Latest from the client, with "Modified local > file" set to "Overwrite" and "Set File Time" set to "Check In". It work= ed. > Now everything is fine. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > John Saunders=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 E-m= ail: [email protected] > Internet Engineer=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0= =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 Tel: +1 508 621 3818 > WWW: www.surfcontrol.com=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0= =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 Fax: +1 508 621 3921 > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 SurfControl - the World's #1 Web & E-mail Filtering Com= pany > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Dan Schreiber [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 17:20 > To: Clayton Dool; Vault-List (E-mail) > Subject: RE: [vault-list] Bug in automerge -- probably not > > When you lose changes, is it the case that none of your edits get > merged, or > is it that some of them seem to make, and some don't? > > If it is the former, it might have something to do with merging > via the GUI > client while the IDE is open. Perhaps VS isn't picking up that the fil= e > changed underneath it? Or, perhaps the file is overwritten > because of some > option setting in Vault? When this happens, check the _sgbak > folder to see > whether the file got backed up, and what its state is in the backup. > > Also, you might want to view the file in the working folder after it is > merged in the GUI client to verify that side of the equation is > clean (or to > figure out if it is the Vault client, the IDE client, or VS itself that= is > the problem). > > -Dan > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [email protected] > > [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Clayton Do= ol > > Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 3:57 PM > > To: Vault-List (E-mail) > > Subject: RE: [vault-list] Bug in automerge -- probably not > > > > > > This is what I am looking for, to find out if it is a problem > people have > > come across before or if it is isolated to just me. If just me, then > > probably some configuration or status of document within Visual > Studios in > > which this is happening. Like I said, most time don't have problem, = but > > rare few times have lost recent changes. I will focus on > exactly what we > > are doing to try and isolate this to user, system configuration, > > or software > > isolation. > > > > Thanks > > - Clayton > > _______________________________________________ > vault-list mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.sourcegear.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vault-list > > Get the latest news on SurfControl and our products, > subscribe to our monthly e-newsletter, SurfAdvisory at: > http://www.surfcontrol.com/resources/surfadvisory/surfadvisory_signup.a= spx > > ********************************************************************* > The information in this email is confidential and may be legally > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this > email by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended > recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken > or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be > unlawful. If you believe that you have received this email in error, > please contact the sender. > ********************************************************************* > SurfControl Inc. > 100 Enterprise Way, Suite A110 > Scotts Valley, California 95066 > 831-440-2500 > _______________________________________________ > vault-list mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.sourcegear.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vault-list