Re: Proposal: Land Greg Ward's patchset immediately

Max Bowsher wrote:
> Given that Greg's patches focus almost exclusively on adding new code, I
> feel happy that it won't break anything existing even without having
> been able to properly review it.
> 
> Given that the current cvs2git/bzr output option is, whilst usable, not
> 100% correct or polished, I don't feel its right to hold the hg code to
> a higher standard before admitting it to the repository.
> 
> On that basis, my inclination is to land Greg's pending patchset
> (witholding README.cvs2hg because it is written assuming that it is
> located in a fork) immediately, and pursue more in depth review after it
> is on trunk.

Yes, Max, you are right.  Feel free to commit with abandon.

Greg, I'm sorry I haven't been more responsive to your work.  If you
were one year old and crying for food (like the other person competing
for my attention) then you'd have hopefully been getting a better
response :-)

Max seems to have both more energy and more familiarity with Mercurial,
so hopefully he will be able to help shepherd your patches into the
project (thanks, Max!).

Michael

------------------------------------------------------
http://cvs2svn.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1667&dsMessageId=2408660

To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [[email protected]].