Re: Headache caused by svn svn migration

On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 9:15 AM, Michael Haggerty <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 2010-06-18, maxb severed the svn:external to the Subversion project.
>  So at least your pain should be short-lived. :-)

It was even shorter-lived than that: on 2009-12-31 (r5023), you
updated the svn:external link.  So it's possible checkout cvs2svn >=
r5023 without problems.  I sent a whine-o-gram to
[email protected] anyways.

> BTW, I believe that r5134, r5135, and r5136 are merges of changes from
> your cvs2hg repository.  Don't be surprised if there are merge conflicts
> on those patches.

Not a problem.  Mercurial knows how to track merges.  ;-)  The real
nightmare will be turning my hg history into a nice linear sequence of
patches that you guys can process easily.  I started that last year,
but have been busy with other things since then.  Still need to
implement Max's request for how I dummy-merge tag fixup commits.
(Which I will do: I think he's right.  Just don't know when.)

Greg

------------------------------------------------------
http://cvs2svn.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1667&dsMessageId=2638840

To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [[email protected]].