Re: cvs2git: redundant M-lines
Michael Haggerty <[email protected]> Thu, 03 Jul 2014 12:22:22 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.version-control.subversion.cvs2svn.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 07/03/2014 08:31 AM, Matwey V. Kornilov wrote: > I think something like the following. But I am not sure whether it > breaks something else. > > Index: git_output_option.py > =================================================================== > --- git_output_option.py (revision 5458) > +++ git_output_option.py (working copy) > @@ -64,7 +64,10 @@ > > def branch_file(self, cvs_symbol): > MirrorUpdater.branch_file(self, cvs_symbol) > - self._modify_file(cvs_symbol, post_commit=False) > + blob1 = cvs_symbol.revision_reader_token > + blob2 = cvs_symbol.get_cvs_revision_source(Ctx()._cvs_items_db).revision_reader_token > + if blob1 != blob2: > + self._modify_file(cvs_symbol, post_commit=False) > > def finish(self): > MirrorUpdater.finish(self) I'm afraid that's not always going to work. The revision_reader_token is an opaque object at the disposal of the revision reader. It is just a coincidence that in your configuration it is the SHA-1 of the blob. For other configurations, it isn't even always used. For example, GitRevisionInlineWriter, later in the same file, doesn't work with a revision reader and so when it is in use this token is not even set. Michael -- Michael Haggerty [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------ http://cvs2svn.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1667&dsMessageId=3084463 To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [[email protected]].