<dir>/foo,v and <dir>/Attic/foo,v
William Rassieur <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.version-control.subversion.cvs2svn.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, I'm actually using cvs2p4 and not cvs2svn, but if my apostasy doesn't preclude submitting a question here, I think my question is in fact relevant. Does anybody know what CVS does when it is going to operate (update, commit, label, etc.) a file ...<dir>/foo and the backend contains ...<dir>/foo,v as well as ...<dir>/Attic/foo,v?? Not having done "use the Source, Luke", it seems to me that CVS would ONLY go to Attic for foo,v if foo,v were not in Attic/.. I've seen other posts to this forum that talk about how something Bad(TM) has happened to the repository when you get doppelgangers like this. But, I'm a pragmatic guy: if people come to me and say my conversion is bad, the gold standard is to test against what they get out of CVS TODAY... (it's one point of view; I like it). Thanks, Bill ------------------------------------------------------ http://cvs2svn.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1670&dsMessageId=2402752 To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [[email protected]].