RE: Problem with vendor branches

> COMPAN Arnaud wrote:
> >
> > In fact, the file from the CVS checkout is different than from the
> SVN checkout.
> > On the CVS checkout (the head), the file is the same as the 1.1.1.1
> revision of the vendor branch.
> > On the SVN checkout (the trunk), the file is the same as the 1.1.1.2
> revision of the vendor branch.
> > According to the documentation, cvs2svn behaves correctly but at the
> end, contents are different.
> > Is it normal ?
> 
> I overlooked in your original email that the file doesn't appear to
> have
> an active vendor branch.  If that is true, there is indeed a problem.
> I
> still would wager that there is some kind of screwy corruption in your
> repository, but it could also be a cvs2svn bug.  Please send a complete
> bug report (see FAQ) so that we can investigate.
> 
> Michael

I think I found the problem. After the first 'cvs import', we used the 'cvs admin -b' command to change the default branch.
In that case, the behavior of cvs2svn (updates trunk to reflect changes on a non-trunk default branch) is not the good one because the default branch has changed.
I send you a bug report.
Regards,
	Arnaud

------------------------------------------------------
http://cvs2svn.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1670&dsMessageId=2403543

To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [[email protected]].