Is there something fishy with branches created in CVS?
Skip Montanaro <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.version-control.subversion.cvs2svn.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I converted a project from CVS to Subversion in early May. For various reasons I only got a workable TkCVS/TkSVN program going last week. When browsing the branch tree for a file I only see branches which were created from trunk after the conversion. I don't see branches which had been created when he code was still in CVS, nor do I see any branches descended from them. These "invisible" branches are fine to use. We have a couple which are active. We check changs into them and do releases from them. They just aren't visible in TkCVS/TkSVN. We don't have ViewVC installed on our Subversion repos yet so I can't check to see if it has similar issues. In case it matters, I'm using TkCVS 8.0.4. 8.1 and 8.2 have known bugs which have yet to be fixed. Is this an issue with TkCVS, with cvs2svn or with my usage of it? At this late date (six-ish months after the conversion) is there something I can do to "fix" the repository? Thanks, -- Skip Montanaro - [email protected] - http://www.smontanaro.net/ ------------------------------------------------------ http://cvs2svn.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1670&dsMessageId=2418500 To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [[email protected]].