Re: Is there something fishy with branches created in CVS?
olli hauer <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.version-control.subversion.cvs2svn.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Skip Montanaro wrote: > I converted a project from CVS to Subversion in early May. For various > reasons I only got a workable TkCVS/TkSVN program going last week. When > browsing the branch tree for a file I only see branches which were > created from trunk after the conversion. I don't see branches which had > been created when he code was still in CVS, nor do I see any branches > descended from them. These "invisible" branches are fine to use. We > have a couple which are active. We check changs into them and do > releases from them. They just aren't visible in TkCVS/TkSVN. We don't > have ViewVC installed on our Subversion repos yet so I can't check to > see if it has similar issues. In case it matters, I'm using TkCVS > 8.0.4. 8.1 and 8.2 have known bugs which have yet to be fixed. > > Is this an issue with TkCVS, with cvs2svn or with my usage of it? At > this late date (six-ish months after the conversion) is there something > I can do to "fix" the repository? > > Thanks, I guess the machine where the repo is located have an svn installed, then use the svn command line there. Maybe it helps to look for files with the command $> svn list file:///REOPATH/REPO/ Or checkout everything at this machine with $> mkdir /space/test-checkout/ $> cd /space/test-checkout/ $> svn co file:///REOPATH/REPO/ -- olli ------------------------------------------------------ http://cvs2svn.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1670&dsMessageId=2418652 To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [[email protected]].